1. The étalés [000M]

[000N] 1·a (Elementary étalés).

We will fix in $M$ a set $\ET$ of morphisms that we want to think of like local isomorphisms. In the examples that we shall consider, these will be either open immersions or étale morphisms. The morphisms of $\ET$ shall be called elementary étalés. We assume that they satisfy the following properties, which are natural given how we think of them, and satisfied by both open immersions and étale morphisms.

  1. Every isomorphism is an elementary étalé.
  2. The composition of two elementary étalés is an elementary étalé.
  3. The elementary étalés are stable under change of base.
  4. If both $u\circ v$ and $v$ are elementary étalés, then so is $u$.

In the terminology of Bénabou, $\ET$ is a calibration in $M$.

The elementary étalés are used to make coverings: we will associate to each affine variety $V$ a set of families of elementary étalés over $V$ that are the covers of $V$. We conventionally ask that isomorphisms are covering, and that coverings are stable under change of base and that they have local character.

[000O] 1·b (Localization data).

We are then in possession of a localization datum on $M$. A localization datum is therefore nothing more than a Grothendieck topology on $M$ in which we have specified the morphisms that are used to make the covers. In algebraic geometry there are well-known localization datums: the Zariski topology with open immersions, and the étale topology with étale morphisms.

[000P] 1·c.

Let $\Sh{M}$ be the topos of sheaves on $M$ with the topology of the localization datum. We denote by $\Yo : M \to \Sh{M}$ the canonical functor. The objects of $\Sh{M}$ are obtained by gluing of affine varieties; the method of gluing is specified by the topology on $M$.

[000Q] 1·d (The little étale topos).

Let us now choose an affine variety $V$. Let $\ET/V$ be the full subcategory of $M/V$ spanned elementary étalés over $V$. $\ET/V$ inherits a Grothendieck topology from the localization datum. Let $\Sh{\ET/V}$ be the topos of sheaves for this topology. The objects of $\Sh{\ET/V}$ are obtained by gluing elementary étalés over $V$; it is thus natural to think of them as the étalés over $V$.

[000R] 1·e (Geometric morphisms between the little and big étale topoi).

The immersion $i:\ET/V\hookrightarrow M/V$ is left exact, continuous and cocontinuous (Artin et al., 1972). It extends into an immersion

$$ \Sum{i} : \Sh{\ET/V}\hookrightarrow \Sh{M/V}=\Sh{M}/\Yo{V} $$

which will allow us to identify the étalés over $V$ with objects of $\Sh{M}$ over $V$. $\Sum{i}$ is left exact, and has a right adjoint $i^\sharp$ (the associated “étalé” functor) which itself has a right adjoint $\Prod{i}$. We therefore have two geometric morphisms

$$ \prn{i^\sharp,\Sum{i}} : \Sh{M}/\Yo{V}\to \Sh{\ET/V}, \quad \prn{\Prod{i},i^\sharp} : \Sh{\ET/V}\to \Sh{M}/\Yo{V} $$

and the composite $i^\sharp\circ\Sum{i}$ is isomorphic to the identity.

[000U] 1·f (Relationship between big and little étale topoi).

The relation between $\Sh{\ET/V}$ and $\Sh{M}/\Yo{V}$ is the same as the one between the little topos and the big topos of a topological space (Artin et al., 1972, sec. IV.4.10). There is also in SGA4 an exercise whose content is more or less what we have just said. (Puzzle: find a point in common between La Samaritaine and SGA 4.)

[000T] Translator’s Note 1·f·a.

La Samaritaine is a Parisian department store, at which “you can find anything. Thanks to François Loeser for explaining the reference.

[000V] Definition 1·g.

We know what the étalés on an affine variety are. The étalés on any object $X$ of $\Sh{M}$ are defined to be the morphisms $Y\to X$ whose inverse image by each morphism $\Yo{V}\to X$ is étalé over $V$. The étalés have properties 1–4 of étalés elementaires. They also obtain a local character: if $\prn{X_i\to X}\Sub{j\in J}$ is a covering family, $Y\to X$ is étalé when each $Y\times_X X_j\to X_j$ is.

[000W] Definition 1·h (Varieties).

We now come to the notion of a variety with respect to a localization datum. A variety is an object $X$ of $\Sh{M}$ that is covered by affine varieties that are étalé over $X$. The advantage of varieties in comparison to other objects of $\Sh{M}$ is: if $X$ is a variety, let $\ET/X$ be the full subcategory of $M/X$ spanned by affine étalés over $X$. $\Sh{\ET/X}$ is the topos of étale’s over $X$ (we may remark that if $Y$ is étalé over a variety $X$, then $Y$ is also a variety). We have the same functors $\Sum{i}$, $i^\sharp$, and $\Prod{i}$ between the little topos $\Sh{\ET/X}$ and the big topos $\Sh{M}/X$.